("I played basketball, so I'm qualified to talk about which baseball players are the best. They play with a ball in baseball, right?")Because unless he plays
1st or
SS and can hit and get on base, he really doesn't improve a club whose problem has been its offense, not pitching staff. After hearing Mychal Thompson (LA Sports Live on ESPN Radio 710) spout off again about how trading for Cliff Lee had to be done, and Clayton Kershaw should have been included, I had to write something, something to not keep screaming obscenities in my head.
And consider what the Dodgers would have had to give up to acquire his services. Colletti smartly deemed Clayton Kershaw off-limits, and taking into account what the Phillies gave up (
4 of their top ten prospects), the Dodgers would have paid a similar price.
Therein lies the problem though - the Dodgers top ten prospects are, on the whole, better than the Phillies top 10 prospects. And yes, I'm biased, but not stupid - the prospects are close, but I would give the Dodgers the edge even if I wasn't a Dodgers fan.
The Phillies, based off of those Baseball America rankings listed above, parted with their #'s 2, 3, 4, and 10 prospects. Obviously the performances of those prospects would have altered their rankings at the time of the trade deadline, but it's still a useful barometer for what was needed to land Lee from the Indians.
Using those same slots, the
Dodgers would have parted with James McDonald (2), Ethan Martin (3), Josh Lindblom (4), and Nathan Eovaldi (10) to acquire Cliff Lee. Again, those rankings would have changed at the trade deadline, and I highly doubt the Indians would have accepted 4 pitchers. The Indians very well could have asked the Dodgers for what the Indians were giving up (2 Pitchers, C, SS), and that new deal would then have been McDonald, Ethan Martin, Dee Gordon, and Andrew Lambo/Josh Bell substituted for a C, since the Dodgers don't have a top catching prospect
any more (thanks Ned & Frank).
I don't know about you, but that's a ridiculous price to pay for a player in Lee who only, at best, makes you marginally better, and doesn't actually address your team's pressing needs of more offense from the 1st base and shortstop positions. Of course the rotation is more formidable with Lee in it because we keep Kershaw and Billingsley and are replacing the # 5 spot of said rotation, but giving up that many high-end prospects just doesn't sit well with me.
The future is always important, and ripping this team apart for, at best, a slightly better shot at winning this year does not simply hurt our future chances, it comes dangerously close to wiping them out.
Here is a very interesting article from ESPN.com regarding Billy Wagner:
http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=4412806
Apparently the Mets are looking to deal him in a trade as they don't believe anyone will pick up the 2.5 million left of his salary for only a month or so. Also, it seems that Gary Sheffield is at it again, looking to be dealt to a contender before the season ends. Livan Hernandez has been dumped also.
In my humble estimation, there are still some glaring questions about our post-season roster, particularly the youth of our relievers. If you have an opportunity to get another starter who can give you innings and save your staff from flaming, I would support the addition of both Hernandez AND Wagner. However, I cannot see the Dodgers trading for Sheffield at all, what with his past and his limited role on the team...BUT....the Dodgers have virtually no power off of their bench at this point. If you can get a player like a Sheffield or, better still, Jason Giambi, and it doesn't cost you much in the way of players, these last few pieces of the puzzle could pay huge dividends in October. Certainly Giambi would cost you very little as would Hernandez. I'm not sure what the Mets would be looking for in return for Wagner.
We will see for certain in the next ten days. I hope Ned makes the right call and adds these component parts. A Kuo/Wagner, Sherril, Broxton quartet is very frickin' scary and would be formidable as hell in Philly. At least one power hitter off the bench in Giambi and, finally, Livan to help Padilla eat up like Pacman the rest of the season's valuable innings, and the Dodgers have the makings of something, even if Livan gets crushed. The risk is worth the reward, I would say.